Posts Tagged ‘The Four Pillars of Investing’

Market Terms: More Ways to Sound Intelligent at Dinner Parties

Posted By damien on February 4th, 2010

dinner party

Every once in awhile, I write about terms and jargon used in the professional investing community.  From what I’ve seen, often professionals will throw around sophisticated-sounding phrases in order to impress or even intimidate their customers.  Since personal finance and investing are passions of mine, I enjoy taking time to learn what the pros are saying.

And 90% of the time,  the concepts and jargon are relatively easy to understand.  So today I’m going over four of the basic terms used to describe types of stocks and stock funds.  Stick with me, they are really easy to understand.  They will be worth learning, especially when you want to impress others at a dinner party.

Small Cap vs. Large Cap Stocks

One way that investors measure and compare stocks is by market capitalization (market cap).  Market cap is the value of all the company’s outstanding stock, otherwise put, the value of all their stock on the market.  So, if all the funds on the stock market were listed from lowest outstanding value to largest, the top half or third would be labeled large cap funds.  Conversely, the bottom half or third would be labeled small cap funds.

Small and large cap are the most general market cap designations, investors also identify mid-cap funds and more recently, micro-cap funds. So why use market cap when talking about stocks?  It turns out that certain trends and patterns follow market cap.  Historically, small cap stocks have had higher rates of return than large cap ones.  If we remember the relationship between risk and return (higher risk = higher possible return and vice-versa), it makes sense that smaller companies, which are (in general) riskier than large ones, would offer a higher rate of return.

Value vs. Growth Stocks

Another way investors stratify the thousands of stocks and funds is by the distinction between value and growth.  Put simply, “good” companies are labeled growth stocks and “bad” companies are “value” stocks.

Now for the most counter-intuitive statement in this post: good companies have bad stocks and bad companies have good stocks.  Follow me as I walk through the reasoning and hopefully you’ll agree by the end.

In The Four Pillars of Investing, William Bernstein uses Wal-Mart and K-Mart to illustrate the point.  Wal-Mart is a good company: constant growth, stellar management, lots of cash reserves for hard times.  K-Mart is a bad company: history of poor management, a recent bankruptcy, and irregular earnings.

Remember the relationship between risk and return that we just talked about? Since K-Mart is a riskier company, it offers a higher rate of return.  Think about it: if K-Mart’s stock offered the same return as Wal-Mart’s, then no one would buy it!  Why buy a riskier stock when a safer one offers the same return?  So, value stocks (bad companies) are riskier than growth stocks and they offer a higher return.

Wrap-Up

Small vs. large cap. Growth vs. value funds.  These are just a couple of the ways professional investors slice and dice the stock market.  Weren’t they easy to understand!  Next time you’re at a party, drop a few of these terms.  You are no longer a member of the ignorant, unwashed masses.  I guarantee you’ll make friends and influence people.

Recipe for Disaster: How to Create a Stock Bubble

Posted By damien on January 21st, 2010
courtesy of flickr.com/photos/amagill/

courtesy of flickr.com/photos/amagill/

Now that you have a basic definition of a stock bubble, let’s look at the underlying factors, or what I call the recipe for a stock bubble.  Why do you care to know how bubbles form?  Because bubbles burst.  And when they do, people lose lots of money.  People like your brother-in-law who cashed in his 401(k) to invest in Snuggies stock, who is now living in your basement.  Once you understand the recipe for stock bubbles, hopefully you can see them forming early and steer clear.

Because your brother-in-law needs somewhere to live.

Once again, we turn to The Four Pillars of Investing by William Bernstein to give us the ingredients for a stock bubble. Once two or more of these factors are present in a market, bubbles form (these ingredients come in no necessary order):

  1. The first is a “displacement”, which in modern times usually means a revolutionary technology or a major shift in financial methods.
  2. The second is the availability of easy credit—borrowed funds that can be employed for speculation.
  3. The [third] is that investors need to have forgotten the last speculative craze.
  4. And [finally], rational investors, able to calculate expected payoffs and risk premiums, must become supplanted by those whose only requirement for purchase is a plausible story.

Voila!  The four ingredients.  In order to bring them from abstraction to reality, let’s see if and how each of the factors was present in the bubble burst of 2007, what many call the real estate or housing bubble.

Ingredient One

Were there any technological or financial innovations that transformed the market?  Heck yes! Ever heard of Mortgage-Backed Securities or Credit Default Swaps?  Crafty financial minds came up with new ways to package mortgages as investment tools and created methods to insure them.  Too bad so many of the mortgages these investment tools were built on were “sub-prime”, meaning the lenders defaulted en masse on their mortgage loans.  And when the sub-primers defaulted en masse, the insurance companies didn’t have enough to cover them!

Ingredient Two

Was credit easily available? Hmm, why don’t we ask the dogs and dead people who were offered pre-approved, no questions asked solicitations for credit cards?  Another example, perhaps you’ve seen Maxed Out, where a loan officer assists a mentally handicapped man sign his name on a loan application (the handicapped man was incapable of working or earning an income).  Or this: The mid-2000s gave us NINJA loans (No-Income-No-Job-or-Assets)!

Ingredients Three and Four

According to Bernstein, ingredients 3 and 4 “can be summarized in one word: euphoria. Investors begin purchasing assets for no other reason than the fact that prices are rising.”  Investors were definitely euphoric: in the mid-2000s stocks were going up and up.  The big institutional investors, Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers, etc were buying and trading all the Mortgage Backed Securities they could get their hands on.  When other institutional investors saw the profits coming in, they jumped onboard.

Unfortunately, bubbles burst.  All of the “profits” and “asset appreciation” were built on speculation and euphoria.  Lehman Brothers went under, AIG got bailed out, and no one is happy.

Hopefully, now that you know what a bubble is and the conditions necessary for their formation, you can keep a cool head and continue diversifying your investments.  Remember, your brother-in-law is going to need someplace to live.

I Said I Wasn’t Gonna Lose My Head, But Then Pop Went the Stock Market

Posted By damien on January 19th, 2010
balloon

courtesy of: flickr.com/photos/amagill/

Back from Winter Break and ready for action! I read some very interesting books over vacation and as a result have many posts lined up with new information about investing, behavioral finance (how emotions affect our money habits), and why index funds beat actively managed funds.

But to begin with, I thought I would post about the financial topic that has been dominating the news for the past two years: the stock market crash and resulting recession.

The term stock market “bubble” gets floated around a lot, most times between people who only have a foggy idea of what it means, but know that it impresses other ignorant people when they say it.  So here, now, I’m going to spell out exactly what a stock bubble is.

Why Should You Care?

Well, perhaps so that the next time one comes around, when everyone and their grandma is mortgaging their houses to buy Snuggies’ stock (because “it’s the next big thing!” you’re brother-in-law assures you), you can keep your head cool.  You’ll keep on investing in index funds, diversifying your asset allocation, and when the Snuggies bubble pops and your brother-in-law has to move in with you, you can tell him “Told you so!”, as he cooks you a hot pocket.

Back to the Explanation…

Let’s turn to my friend William Bernstein, author of The Four Pillars of Investing: Lessons for Building a Winning Portfolio, who gives us a clear and simple definition of a stock bubble:

Bubbles occur whenever investors begin buying stocks simply because they have been going up. The process feeds on itself, like a bonfire, until all fuel is exhausted, and it finally collapses.

Quite simply, a stock bubble is the result of the bandwagon effect.  Like in middle school, when all the cool kids stopped wearing whitie-tighties and switched to boxers.  You had to do it too.  Sure, boxers offered less support and were more prone to wedgies, but EVERYONE WAS DOING IT.

Fast-forward 20 years, and for the same reasons, you buy Snuggies stock.  It’s going up! And, everyone is buying it! Well, it’s going up because everyone is buying it, not necessarily because of any increase in intrinsic value.

Now that you know what a stock bubble is, you can use the term with wisdom.  But simply knowing the definition won’t help you see them coming and avoid them.  That’s why next post I will give you the recipe for a stock bubble: I’ll spell out the factors needed in a market for a bubble to form.  Stay tuned!

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes